1. Welcome to Tundras.com!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tundra discussion topics
    • Transfer over your build thread from a different forum to this one
    • Communicate privately with other Tundra owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Gas mileage?

Discussion in '2.5 Gen Tundras (2014-2021)' started by Steelyhead, Mar 1, 2019.

  1. Mar 6, 2019 at 4:07 AM
    #61
    thexman1

    thexman1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2018
    Member:
    #16326
    Messages:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    James
    Dayton, Ohio
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tundra (AKA: "The Mothership")
    I was getting 15-16 miles/gallon with road tires. Switched to Terra Grappler G2 All-Terrain tires and am getting 12-14. When I'm pulling the trailer, I'm getting 6-8.
     
    dooododoo likes this.
  2. Mar 6, 2019 at 7:12 AM
    #62
    Therin7

    Therin7 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2019
    Member:
    #26226
    Messages:
    209
    West Tennessee
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra Platinum
    Whatever, im sure you are correct as you were riding with me......you folks argue about shit that is inconsequential like a bunch of librals. I could give fuck all if you believe me, as I was the one paying for the gas. Enjoy your 13-17mpgs, if you want more buy another brand. Peace.
     
  3. Mar 6, 2019 at 7:13 AM
    #63
    Therin7

    Therin7 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2019
    Member:
    #26226
    Messages:
    209
    West Tennessee
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra Platinum
    You know less than you think.
     
  4. Mar 6, 2019 at 7:30 AM
    #64
    UpSteer32

    UpSteer32 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2018
    Member:
    #16530
    Messages:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    I know enough....for example, I know that a lot of internet-goers who claim to consistently get 22-23mpg with their Chevy v8 1/2 tons are deliberately lying or not smart enough to hand calculate.


    Fuelly shows what these vehicles are getting on average...any big-fish tales about much higher mpg's are outliers or fabrications.
     
    tundra403 likes this.
  5. Mar 6, 2019 at 8:27 AM
    #65
    Newm

    Newm New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Member:
    #5908
    Messages:
    649
    Gender:
    Male
    KC
    [​IMG]
     
  6. Mar 6, 2019 at 8:34 AM
    #66
    West Texas Tundra

    West Texas Tundra 2016 Bronze Beast

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2019
    Member:
    #25539
    Messages:
    461
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Leo
    Odessa, Tx
    Vehicle:
    2016 Sunset Bronze
    20 inch CECO wheels Drop in K&N air filter 2 inch front leveling kit
    I’ve got 53k on my 2016 CM 1794 2wd and do 90% city driving. I’m averaging 13.9 to 14.5.
     
  7. Mar 6, 2019 at 8:36 AM
    #67
    hnsmrob

    hnsmrob New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Member:
    #18847
    Messages:
    34
    Gender:
    Male
    Tampa, FL
    Vehicle:
    Maximum Effort
    Be happy if its above 12!!
     
    dooododoo likes this.
  8. Mar 6, 2019 at 8:37 AM
    #68
    West Texas Tundra

    West Texas Tundra 2016 Bronze Beast

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2019
    Member:
    #25539
    Messages:
    461
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Leo
    Odessa, Tx
    Vehicle:
    2016 Sunset Bronze
    20 inch CECO wheels Drop in K&N air filter 2 inch front leveling kit
    That’s what I’m learning. But when I stop on the pedal, does it move? Absolutely.
     
  9. Mar 6, 2019 at 9:30 AM
    #69
    TomyTun

    TomyTun New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2016
    Member:
    #5016
    Messages:
    472
    Gender:
    Male
    CA
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD Off Road, Crewmax, 5.7L Non-FFV
    None
    By the way, it’s spelt liberal. Just because I was proving my point doesn’t mean you need to get all bent out of shape about it. You didn’t get your way and are throwing a fit like a typical liberal.
     
  10. Mar 6, 2019 at 9:59 AM
    #70
    TomyTun

    TomyTun New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2016
    Member:
    #5016
    Messages:
    472
    Gender:
    Male
    CA
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD Off Road, Crewmax, 5.7L Non-FFV
    None
    #fakenews :)
     
  11. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:02 AM
    #71
    thexman1

    thexman1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2018
    Member:
    #16326
    Messages:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    James
    Dayton, Ohio
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tundra (AKA: "The Mothership")
    Amen!

    #ItsTheTruth
     
    hnsmrob[QUOTED] likes this.
  12. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:07 AM
    #72
    TomyTun

    TomyTun New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2016
    Member:
    #5016
    Messages:
    472
    Gender:
    Male
    CA
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD Off Road, Crewmax, 5.7L Non-FFV
    None
    I’ll only put it on my truck if it increases my instant fuel mileage.
     
    Newm and TRDSPORT118[QUOTED] like this.
  13. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:19 AM
    #73
    15whtrd

    15whtrd Mr. Blonde

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2015
    Member:
    #1829
    Messages:
    9,387
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Sean
    SoCal
    Vehicle:
    White 2015 Tundra DC SR5 TRD 4x4 5.7L, White 2003 Sequoia 2WD
    TRD Pro suspension, +2 Coachbuilder shackles, 2015 TRD Pro headlights, 20% ceramic tinted windows, clear ceramic tinted front windshield, aFe drop in pro s dry air filter, TRD airflow accelerator, TRD oil fill cap, TRD 18 psi radiator cap, BDX Bullydog tuner, Weathertech floor mats front and rear, rear seat fold down mod, DNA hard trifold tonneau cover, Linex with uv protection, TRD rear swaybar, TRD center caps, TRD Pro grille insert with color matching surround and bulge, TRD PRO headlights, aluminum oil filter canister, Real truck tailgate seal, Pop-n-lock tailgate lock actuator, rear diff breather relocate, RCI front skid plate. 275/70 R18 BFG KO2s
     
    Moon Puppy, hnsmrob and Newm like this.
  14. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:24 AM
    #74
    SoCalTundy

    SoCalTundy Member since 2017

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Member:
    #21476
    Messages:
    418
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Icon Shocks. Total Chaos UCA. Deaver u748 TC shackles Flowmaster super 50. Diode Dynamics fogs. 5.29 Revolution Gears. SSW 17" wheels on BFG 35x12.5
    My computer says im getting 12.2 mpg, but im running 35s. 35s are 9.7% larger than stock, so add 9.7% to 12.2 and I’m actually getting 13.4 mpg :notsure:
     
  15. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:27 AM
    #75
    UpSteer32

    UpSteer32 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2018
    Member:
    #16530
    Messages:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    That math doesn't make sense.

    Just measure your miles driven (via GPS, since your odometer is off) and divide that by the # of gallons you put into your fuel tank....simple as that.
     
  16. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:29 AM
    #76
    SoCalTundy

    SoCalTundy Member since 2017

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Member:
    #21476
    Messages:
    418
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Icon Shocks. Total Chaos UCA. Deaver u748 TC shackles Flowmaster super 50. Diode Dynamics fogs. 5.29 Revolution Gears. SSW 17" wheels on BFG 35x12.5
    The math makes perfect sense. I’ve done what you mentioned and get very close to the same results.
     
  17. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:33 AM
    #77
    UpSteer32

    UpSteer32 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2018
    Member:
    #16530
    Messages:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Increasing your mpg's by 9.7% because your tire size went up by 9.7% makes mathematical sense to you?

    I'm interested to see if you can actually prove the logic behind that.

    Dividing miles driven by gallons consumed is literally the most accurate way to determine your mpg's...but do what you want.
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2019
  18. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:35 AM
    #78
    West Texas Tundra

    West Texas Tundra 2016 Bronze Beast

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2019
    Member:
    #25539
    Messages:
    461
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Leo
    Odessa, Tx
    Vehicle:
    2016 Sunset Bronze
    20 inch CECO wheels Drop in K&N air filter 2 inch front leveling kit
    Good thing about mathematics is that it’s allllllll relative. Lol
     
  19. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:44 AM
    #79
    SoCalTundy

    SoCalTundy Member since 2017

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Member:
    #21476
    Messages:
    418
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Icon Shocks. Total Chaos UCA. Deaver u748 TC shackles Flowmaster super 50. Diode Dynamics fogs. 5.29 Revolution Gears. SSW 17" wheels on BFG 35x12.5
    Yes, because my truck thinks it’s traveled 12.2 miles on one gallon when in fact it’s traveled 9.7% farther because of the size of the tire. If my odometer says I’ve traveled 20k miles, that is inaccurate because of my larger tire, unless there’s something i don’t know about Toyota and it’s tracking mileage via gps instead of spin on my tires. That goes for speed too. Your truck might say you’re going 65 mph, but if you have a larger tire then you’re actually going faster.
     
  20. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:44 AM
    #80
    tundra403

    tundra403 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2019
    Member:
    #26382
    Messages:
    121
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    KG
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tundra SR5 4x4 TSS Off Road - MGM
    -Internal LED Lights -Added VLED's Footwell light strip
    yea shitty ethanol gas hurts hard.. Ive heard the same.. folks running pure fuel on long hauls and regularly using it.. Its just pricier but that gas is just better. I use it on all my ATV's/RTV's and lawn equipment.
     
  21. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:52 AM
    #81
    tundra403

    tundra403 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2019
    Member:
    #26382
    Messages:
    121
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    KG
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tundra SR5 4x4 TSS Off Road - MGM
    -Internal LED Lights -Added VLED's Footwell light strip
    my father in law has GMC v6. He gets decent mileage only because it cuts down to 4cyl when he gets going steady.. he does regret not getting the v8. But im glad toyota doesnt waste their time with a cut off like that. I'm not the expert but too many engineers says it hurts the engine... switching between cylinders.. especially in a truck when you need the power instantly. As stated, no expert , just restating what i heard, but it makes sense. ------------I work on cyber security software so that's my forte.- not engines.


    As @Jeremylee said.. if you run pure fuel.. game changer.
     
  22. Mar 6, 2019 at 10:55 AM
    #82
    UpSteer32

    UpSteer32 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2018
    Member:
    #16530
    Messages:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    What your truck thinks its getting in terms of mpg is a vague estimate, often one that is highly inaccurate.

    When you increase your vehicle's tire diameter by x%, you increase its distance traveled by x%. Increasing your dashboard mpg readout by that x% does not accurately account for the changes to your speed (speedometer) or distance traveled (odometer). It just doesn't.

    Determine your miles driven (use a 3rd party GPS or Google Maps) and divide that by the gallons consumed (derived from the pump); that yields an accurate mpg.

    Or get your speedometer and odometer re-calibrated for the bigger tire size.
     
  23. Mar 6, 2019 at 11:21 AM
    #83
    SoCalTundy

    SoCalTundy Member since 2017

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Member:
    #21476
    Messages:
    418
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Icon Shocks. Total Chaos UCA. Deaver u748 TC shackles Flowmaster super 50. Diode Dynamics fogs. 5.29 Revolution Gears. SSW 17" wheels on BFG 35x12.5
    Like I said in a previous post, I have used both methods; the one you’re talking about and trusting the calculation on the truck. Both were very similar after applying the math. I can’t speak for other trucks, but on my truck the calculation is very close to accurate. Here’s some history as well. Prior to upgrades, I was averaging over 14mpg. I lifted it along with 33s and those numbers dropped to 13.8mpg using the math. Just added 35s and my mpg has dropped more to 13.4 and my numbers would be worse but I’ve changed my driving habits since adding the 35s.
     
  24. Mar 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM
    #84
    UpSteer32

    UpSteer32 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2018
    Member:
    #16530
    Messages:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Well it may be coincidental that your numbers match up when cross-checked with hand calculations.

    I'm just noting that increasing your estimated mpg's by the same percent by which your tire size was increased does not make mathematical sense. I think people will normally increase their odometer readout by that percent, but even then it's not going to be 100% accurate.
     
  25. Mar 6, 2019 at 11:40 AM
    #85
    TxTaco

    TxTaco New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2019
    Member:
    #26265
    Messages:
    44
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2019 White 1794
    Why all the doom and gloom about mileage .... i'm getting 4 mpg better with my Tundra than my last vehicle (2004 GMC 2500HD 4x4)
    Hell I'm ecstatic about the mileage.
     
    tundra403, TRDSPORT118 and thexman1 like this.
  26. Mar 6, 2019 at 11:41 AM
    #86
    SoCalTundy

    SoCalTundy Member since 2017

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Member:
    #21476
    Messages:
    418
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Icon Shocks. Total Chaos UCA. Deaver u748 TC shackles Flowmaster super 50. Diode Dynamics fogs. 5.29 Revolution Gears. SSW 17" wheels on BFG 35x12.5
    Good back and forth conversation bud. Please note I’ve said similar and very close to accurate which do not equal accurate, but the numbers after calculating off the trip meter are very close and are good enough to report on that. If they were off by even 1 mpg then that would be too much and I would then deem the truck meter off by a lot, but that is not the case here. The numbers are very close and it’s not a coincidence.
     
  27. Mar 6, 2019 at 12:43 PM
    #87
    Ronin73

    Ronin73 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2018
    Member:
    #21994
    Messages:
    460
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2019 Tundra Crewmax SR5 4x4 5.7 Magnetic Grey Metallic
    I have a question concerning all of the gas MPG differences among folks here. Everyone says tire size matters. How much in the various stock options? Some CM Tundras come with 255/70/18 as stock. Another might have have 275/65/18 as stock. Are both of these stock tire differences enough to account for the differing MPG among those two trucks?
     
  28. Mar 6, 2019 at 1:10 PM
    #88
    UpSteer32

    UpSteer32 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2018
    Member:
    #16530
    Messages:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Increasing your mpg readout by the same % by which your tire size increases is not an accurate way to determine mpg's. Nor is there any mathematical basis for that method.

    I'm just being honest with you....take it or leave it.
     
  29. Mar 6, 2019 at 2:20 PM
    #89
    SoCalTundy

    SoCalTundy Member since 2017

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Member:
    #21476
    Messages:
    418
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Icon Shocks. Total Chaos UCA. Deaver u748 TC shackles Flowmaster super 50. Diode Dynamics fogs. 5.29 Revolution Gears. SSW 17" wheels on BFG 35x12.5
    I totally disagree with you on that and the argument supports it, but it is what it is.
     
  30. Mar 6, 2019 at 2:22 PM
    #90
    SoCalTundy

    SoCalTundy Member since 2017

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Member:
    #21476
    Messages:
    418
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Icon Shocks. Total Chaos UCA. Deaver u748 TC shackles Flowmaster super 50. Diode Dynamics fogs. 5.29 Revolution Gears. SSW 17" wheels on BFG 35x12.5
    I didn’t know tundras came in different 18” size tires. Whatever your truck came out of the dealer with brand new is what the manufacturer calibrated it for unless they customized it and didn’t calibrate afterwards.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top