Official 2022 Tundra 3rd Gen Thread

Orrr I can buy a bad ass ocean boat.

 

black rhino has some nice lightweight flow formed... offset is +12 though so would be some poke...
https://www.blackrhinowheels.com/flow-form-technology-truck-wheels.php

 

Regarding E-rated tires, that's a choice each person has to make. Most people do E-rated because they're puncture resistant on sharp rocks, especially if you air down. With 18" wheels sometimes you get limited choices for tires. Maybe a C-rated or D-rated would be fine, but does the tire manufacturer of your choice provide that for 18" wheels?

Anyway, in that video Discount Tire probably aired the Geolandars to 35psi. Max psi is probably 70psi for E-rated and he probably would have got better MPG at max psi.

 

Yall think windchill white is hard to paint? Want to get the WCP platinum now but want the front grille surround painted.

 

I saw the toolbox make a mark but I would have been surprised if it didn't.

Anyway, no giant pumpkin so the test is incomplete. Still impressive though!

 

E rated tires usually have a max PSI of 80

 

Them bumper end caps wiggled a ton lol

 

https://www-caranddriver-com.cdn.am...s/a38628782/2022-toyota-tundra-hybrid-tested/

 

For those looking for a 2022, saw this thought I would share, I know nothing about this dealership!

 

Found this on the tube today. Well someone poor guy had to be the first.

 

Hope he's OK. The truck can be replaced.

 

Saw this on the FB group. 295/30R26.

 

Don't really care about drag racing my truck but 5.7 seconds 0-60 in a 6000+ lbs truck is very respectable. Fords a little faster but that is likely a combination of torque management and more weight which I actually prefer when towing.

 

And we don't know price yet.

 

I assume based on that comment that the story is about the hybrid and thus GM and Ram (and Nissan) don't even have a direct competitor.

 

33 x 11.6.
They fill the wheel wells nicely, but now the brakes look pitifully small and the look is all wrong.
Expensive, too, I'll bet: "We got no food on the table, but we got RIMS!"

Steve

 

Did those come off his 93 Caprice Classic?

 

What’s with this being a three truck comparison with all the RAM references. Did they just exclude RAM so that there wasn’t anything that was “worse” than the Toyota? But then include it so it made no sense.

 

I agree with that, my biggest takeaway was the increased weight which means payload is going to be further reduced. Those pulling a decent trailer are probably better off going non hybrid.

 

They tweaked the GVWR so the hybrid versions have a higher GVWR to minimize payload loss. Makes you wonder why the non-hybrid version doesn't get the higher GVWR

 

Apologies if this has been asked already, but does anyone know if the signature headlights (Limited and up) will be swappable with the standard ones (SR/SR5)? I’d really like to add the signature lights to my SR5.

 

In my opinion, the extra weight will make it a better tow vehicle. I know the technical numbers maybe lower, but more weight in the tow vehicle will make is more stable.

 

I bet the hybrid has stiffer springs so they didn’t install them on the non-hybrid to keep a smooth ride. Toyota should offer a heavy duty spring package like Ford does and tradeoff ride comfort.

 

That's just wrong.

 

I didn't know that, good info.

I agree 100%, but yes the technical numbers will be lower. Heavier makes it more stable, friends of mine with aluminum f150's say they don't feel as stable as there older pre aluminum versions.

 

Does the hybrid drop .1 liters of displacement or do they not proof read before they publish. Specs of the engine would be important to double check if I was incharge of a media group called car and driver

 

Technically it is a 3.4 I think it's 3440 cc or something like that. Toyota just rounds up to 3.5

 

Thanks, I did not know that

 

The displacement of the V6TT engine is 3.445L and I guess Toyota just rounds up to 3.5L but some will round down to 3.4L. Ford’s 3.5L is 3.496L.