1. Welcome to Tundras.com!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tundra discussion topics
    • Transfer over your build thread from a different forum to this one
    • Communicate privately with other Tundra owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

13 mpg ???

Discussion in '2.5 Gen Tundras (2014-2021)' started by jahwarrior007, Dec 18, 2024.

  1. Dec 20, 2024 at 8:04 AM
    #31
    MVRCA

    MVRCA New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2024
    Member:
    #125659
    Messages:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    Las Vegas
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tundra TRD Pro
    White Knuckle sliders, BDS 3" lift with Fox 2.5's. Method 305 NV with 35" Trail Grapplers.
    In 16 when I ordered the Pro, it was almost the same price as the Tacoma, and the dealers said the gas mileage was hurting Tundra sales. I'm not gonna say MPG doesn't matter to me, but it not to the point I'd consider a different truck.
     
    Tundra family likes this.
  2. Dec 21, 2024 at 3:05 PM
    #32
    SoCal_Tundra21

    SoCal_Tundra21 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2024
    Member:
    #120830
    Messages:
    53
    Gender:
    Male
    2.5 lift 33" tires, 13mpg mix freeway and local
     
    MadMaxCanon likes this.
  3. Dec 21, 2024 at 7:38 PM
    #33
    lr172

    lr172 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2024
    Member:
    #123527
    Messages:
    253
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    07 DC
    Modern EFI systems will advance timing up to detonation and then back off a bit. Higher octane allows more advance, which provides more performance. No surprise that mpg goes up. Unfortunately the premium today for higher octane fuel exceeds the savings. Also likely that the higher octane fuel has less alcohol in it. Alcohol has about 10% less energy potential than gasoline.
     
    Tundra family likes this.
  4. Dec 21, 2024 at 8:02 PM
    #34
    WhiteSR5

    WhiteSR5 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2024
    Member:
    #124457
    Messages:
    172
    SC
    Vehicle:
    2021 DC SR5 4x4 (guess the color)
    Flex Fuel or no? How old are plugs? Original Oxygen and MAF sensors?

    13 MPG isn’t terrible, but the above listed components can contribute to poor fuel economy as they age and wear.
     
  5. Dec 22, 2024 at 5:49 AM
    #35
    Oey12

    Oey12 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2020
    Member:
    #45061
    Messages:
    1,486
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Joey
    New York
    Vehicle:
    2020 SR5 TRD OFFROAD
    Coach Builder 1 inch lift strut spacers Coach Builder 1 inch shackles TRD Sway Bar Diode Dynamics SS
    I noticed the same thing on my old 2012 V6 Tacoma in which I hand calculated the MPG’s. Everyone told it was BS…

    The best mpg (for the tank) ever got out of that truck was 21. Crazy part was that I was towing a trailer with an heavy utility ATV in upstate NY (very mountainous), however I used ethanol (devils juice for motors) free 91 octane gas.

    Edit: I feel bad for some of you owners who are only getting 11-13. That sucks, I average around 16 but I do 75% highway. On a solid highway trip I can achieve 17.
     
  6. Dec 22, 2024 at 7:49 AM
    #36
    Jaywhy

    Jaywhy New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2017
    Member:
    #8386
    Messages:
    90
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Vehicle:
    2016 SW TRD Pro CM
    Been driving a 2016 pro for 130,000 miles with slightly oversized a/t tires. Mixed use driving but long road trips as well. Lifetime average is probably in the 13-13.5 range. You're doing fine, this truck is not efficient. On highway trips I've gotten as good as 17.5 but I've seen noticeable dropoff in mpg doing more than 70, and god help you if you're driving into the wind.
     
    Jpd0144 and 2020cement_tundra like this.
  7. Dec 22, 2024 at 10:49 AM
    #37
    Ericsopa

    Ericsopa Old man and the sea

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2015
    Member:
    #2069
    Messages:
    1,501
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    N of Rio Grande, S of Red, E of Pecos, W of Sabine
    Vehicle:
    2013 Tundra CrewMax TRD Ltd Super Duper White OVtuned
    With 225K+ on the odo, no change in mileage for the entire 225K miles. No change in sensors or anything else, except plugs (twice) and a couple cleanings of the MAF and throttle body. If you're mileage is mostly in town, stop 'n' go traffic, hilly terrain, lots of head/crosswinds, etc., then you're doing just fine. I live about 20 miles from a small town, do no driving in traffic, and it's a little hilly going to and from town. My MPG average runs 16.5-17. But on those occasions when I have to spend a few days driving in city traffic, I am down to 11-14. You're driving a 3 ton brick. It takes BTUs to move it.
     
  8. Jan 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM
    #38
    Leedaar

    Leedaar New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2023
    Member:
    #103628
    Messages:
    64
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tundra CM
    My previous setup : cheap 33inch tires weighing 90lbs each. Leveling kit. 11-12mpg

    current setup:35 inch Toyo open country. 13-14mpg

    Accepted the fact that the tundras will be low teens. Still driving my Prius to work :D
     
  9. Jan 2, 2025 at 4:44 AM
    #39
    Stumpjumper

    Stumpjumper Not a new member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2016
    Member:
    #4546
    Messages:
    3,429
    Gender:
    Male
    Fate, Tx
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tundra TSS 4x4
    I have never seen 33" tires that weighed 90 lbs. Back in the 80s I ran Buckshot MTs in 12.5x33x15 on a F150. They might have weighed 90 lbs.

    I have noticed that temps have a big effect on MPGs. I often make the same 225 mile drive to the ranch I hunt on. Most drives I get right at 16 but on 1 return trip home I got 18.5. Tailwind helped somewhat but only 5 to 10. Biggest difference was the temps. It was during spring turkey season and temps were warmer then typical during fall deer season.
     
  10. Jan 2, 2025 at 4:47 AM
    #40
    The Dude

    The Dude New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2020
    Member:
    #41747
    Messages:
    327
    Gender:
    Male
    Chandler, AZ, not anymore :(
    Yeah, that’s pretty normal

    IMG_5545.png
     
  11. Jan 3, 2025 at 9:07 AM
    #41
    jmdaniel

    jmdaniel Spending too much time here...

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Member:
    #10967
    Messages:
    322
    Gender:
    Male
    Leander, TX
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tundra CrewMax SR5, 1977 FJ40
    DSI Conversion, including 6" ProComp lift, Fuel Assault Rims, ProComp tires, SunTek protective film, BAK Revolver X2 tonneau cover, Bedrug bedmat, OEM Audio+ Reference 500Q
    Same. When I do see 13, it causes a little stirring...
     
  12. Jan 3, 2025 at 12:16 PM
    #42
    Rlachermeier

    Rlachermeier New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2017
    Member:
    #7441
    Messages:
    29
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Randy
    Vehicle:
    2019 Toyota Tundra Crewmax Platinum Edition
    I'm at 140K and have gotten 15 from day one.
     
  13. Jan 3, 2025 at 7:54 PM
    #43
    jmanscotch

    jmanscotch New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2018
    Member:
    #21588
    Messages:
    91
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jake
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2020 Tundra TRD OR CM
    I’m stock suspension and 35s and I get 10.5 MPG with my daily Colorado commute (with a heavy foot).

    I figure what i waste on extra gas, I save on mechanic visits and frustrations. We’ve had several Toyotas and none of their regular gas SUVs or trucks get good gas mileage…yet they’re still so popular. Why? Because knowing you’ll get there, reliably, is worth the few less MPG to most people.

    Exhibit A: me deep in the mountains where the 38 gallon tank means I can get remote despite the horrible gas mileage. While I still know I can get back, because of the Toyota reliability. This wasn’t always the case, as I learned many times, back in my younger years as a Jeep fanboy.

    IMG_8066.jpg
     
    CaptRussia253 likes this.
  14. Jan 5, 2025 at 2:28 PM
    #44
    2020cement_tundra

    2020cement_tundra New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2020
    Member:
    #54676
    Messages:
    262
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Nick
    SC
    Vehicle:
    2020 tundra
    Yeah my 2020 tundra gets way worse mpg then my 2008 Silverado, but pulls way better. So I’ll take that.
     
  15. Jan 6, 2025 at 6:21 AM
    #45
    Stumpjumper

    Stumpjumper Not a new member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2016
    Member:
    #4546
    Messages:
    3,429
    Gender:
    Male
    Fate, Tx
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tundra TSS 4x4
    Lowest MPGs yesterday on a drive I do often. Hilly road with nasty head winds. Almost blew the lid off my cooler in bed. First time to get 13 not towing. I was hoping to beat the front but it came through early.

    20250105_221941.jpg
     
  16. Jan 6, 2025 at 8:10 AM
    #46
    blanchard7684

    blanchard7684 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2018
    Member:
    #21856
    Messages:
    906
    Gender:
    Male
    Best I've ever seen on my 2019 Pro is 17.5 mpg. Worst is 9 mpg. Typically in the 13-15 mpg range. Yes this thing has a Genuine Cooling systems aux transmission cooler.

    By comparison...

    I picked up a 2024 suburban with 5.3 *. With or without the DFM system engaged, best I've seen is 21 mpg. Typically in the 18-19 mpg range.

    So... similar weight vehicles. One with smaller V8 and complex fuel management system (electric power steering, electric fan, 10 spd transmission, 3.23 rear gear) vs old school port fuel injected V8 with larger displacement (hydraulic power steering, mechanical fan, 6 spd, 4.30 rear gear). Same driver, same gas, same roads, same conditions, same payload while driving.

    The complexity only buys you a few MPGs. In real world driving I get 3 mpg better in a 2024 5.3 suburban than my 2019 Pro.

    One thing I did do in my 2019 that made a noticeable difference in mpg was change the rear and front differential oils to Royal Purple. I picked up a solid and calculatable 0.5 mpg. I'm not a Royal Purple homer, I expect similar results going to an Amsoil product. My local parts store happened to have RP so I tried it.

    *best of bad options. Needed a super sized SUV and found a suburban with no air suspension and no moon roof with z71 package.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top