1. Welcome to Tundras.com!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tundra discussion topics
    • Transfer over your build thread from a different forum to this one
    • Communicate privately with other Tundra owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Seems like all tires are E-rated now..

Discussion in 'Wheels & Tires' started by Bourbonator, Mar 29, 2023.

  1. Mar 29, 2023 at 1:10 AM
    #1
    Bourbonator

    Bourbonator [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2021
    Member:
    #69867
    Messages:
    433
    North ID
    Vehicle:
    '23 LE CM 6.5
    When I was younger, maybe 20 years ago, there was a wide selection of C-rated LT tires, in any size you could imagine. Now, it seems like everything is E-rated. I don't have a 1-ton pickup, and I'm not towing every day. I don't need an E-rated tire. However, I do haul 1200-1500 lbs of firewood per week in the summer, and sometimes, I need to trailer my antique car. A C-rated tire is definitely up to that task. Why are C, and even D rated tires so rare these days?
     
  2. Mar 29, 2023 at 4:02 AM
    #2
    10TundraSR5

    10TundraSR5 Happy Tundra owner

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Member:
    #20824
    Messages:
    854
    Gender:
    Male
    Tennessee
    Vehicle:
    2010 Black Tundra SR5
    Curse you Perry the Platypus!
  3. Apr 3, 2023 at 12:54 PM
    #3
    _none_

    _none_ Poser

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2023
    Member:
    #94306
    Messages:
    455
    Vehicle:
    2020 DC SR5 4x4
    Agreed. It's a bit frustrating when looking for tires. Of course, it really depends on the size too. Stock 275/65 18s can be found in standard SL ratings, but if you bump up to 275/70 18, there are only about 3 non e-rated options.

    17s offer better c-options. And thanks to Jeep, 285/70 17 c-rated options are plentiful.
     
  4. Apr 3, 2023 at 11:47 PM
    #4
    Bourbonator

    Bourbonator [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2021
    Member:
    #69867
    Messages:
    433
    North ID
    Vehicle:
    '23 LE CM 6.5
    Yeah, but I really don't want to go with 17s for wheels. The brake clearance on the 22+ is so tight, and I spend a good bit of time on gravel, dirt, and unimproved roads. Oh well. I'm not going to do anything probably until after next winter.
     
  5. Apr 4, 2023 at 3:23 AM
    #5
    ScenicRoute

    ScenicRoute New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2021
    Member:
    #57970
    Messages:
    792
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tim
    Vehicle:
    2021 Tundra CM Nightshade
    Eibach stage 2 (JUNK), SmartCap, Airbags, CoachBuilder Stuff, Bora spacers, 35” falken AT3W tires.
    What’s the big deal with running an E tire. I think if you rode in a truck with E tires and no one told you, you’d never notice. The winter tires on my tundra are E and the summer tires are F. You don’t have to run them at 80 psi!
     
    Terndrerrr and mountaingroan like this.
  6. Apr 4, 2023 at 3:33 AM
    #6
    KNABORES

    KNABORES Sarcasm incoming

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Member:
    #40572
    Messages:
    13,718
    Gender:
    Male
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    2000 Limited TRD AC 4X4 Thunder Grey 278k miles. *SOLD* 2019 Limited TRD CM 4x4
    Bilstein 5100's on the forbidden notch Husky HD rear leafs 16x8 Eagle Alloy 187's with 285/75/16 MagnaFlow 3" flow through Pioneer touchscreen with backup camera Full interior and dash LED conversion Trailer brake controller with 7 pin Bedliner coat bumpers & trim ARE Mpulse topper - Rhino Vortex rack
    You've probably just gone nose blind to your stiff tires. There’s definitely a difference
     
    Kung and 17inferno like this.
  7. Apr 4, 2023 at 4:56 AM
    #7
    _none_

    _none_ Poser

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2023
    Member:
    #94306
    Messages:
    455
    Vehicle:
    2020 DC SR5 4x4

    It's all about the weight. Stock 18" Michelins weigh around 41lbs. Any e-rated tire you find in the stock size is going to weigh about 12-15lbs more per tire. That's huge. When you bump up to a larger than stock tire, the difference only gets larger, then you add in people with aftermarket, heavier wheels too.

    That extra weight negatively impacts your ride but also impacts the handling, acceleration, braking and overall fuel economy. You're just giving away power.
     
    BanksyB31 and BTBAKER like this.
  8. Apr 4, 2023 at 5:03 AM
    #8
    BTBAKER

    BTBAKER .

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2017
    Member:
    #11185
    Messages:
    5,412
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brad
    Castle Rock
    Vehicle:
    2022 Ram TRX Level 2
    Agree OP. E rated is over kill for most. Maybe the BFG KO3 that’s coming out will have more options?
     
    Coppertune and FirstGenVol like this.
  9. Apr 4, 2023 at 5:22 AM
    #9
    be_unscared

    be_unscared Not a truck doctor

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2023
    Member:
    #90926
    Messages:
    165
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brendan
    Central Cal
    Vehicle:
    21 Army Green w/skewp 4x4
    The only guaranteed option with the new BFGs is that you’re going to replace them soon, I’m afraid. Terrible how much their quality has slipped just in the last few years.
     
    SC4333 and Terndrerrr like this.
  10. Apr 4, 2023 at 7:37 AM
    #10
    FirstGenVol

    FirstGenVol Check the name tag. You're in my world now.

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2018
    Member:
    #22934
    Messages:
    14,150
    East TN
    Vehicle:
    2002 AC TRD 4x4 V8
    Certainly hasn't been my experience.

    @Bourbonator, I'm actually running BFG KO2's in load range C. That's one option for you.
     
    BTBAKER and _none_ like this.
  11. Apr 4, 2023 at 7:54 AM
    #11
    NewImprovedRon

    NewImprovedRon New Old Guy

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2022
    Member:
    #77346
    Messages:
    895
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ron
    NW Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    2015 Radiant Red Tundra
    Likewise, here.
     
  12. Apr 4, 2023 at 11:25 AM
    #12
    _none_

    _none_ Poser

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2023
    Member:
    #94306
    Messages:
    455
    Vehicle:
    2020 DC SR5 4x4
    What sizes are you running? 17"? I had 255/75 17 c-rated K02 on my last truck. I really liked the tires. Wish i could get a 275/70 18 in the same.
     
    BTBAKER likes this.
  13. Apr 4, 2023 at 11:55 AM
    #13
    FirstGenVol

    FirstGenVol Check the name tag. You're in my world now.

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2018
    Member:
    #22934
    Messages:
    14,150
    East TN
    Vehicle:
    2002 AC TRD 4x4 V8
    285/70/17 here. I'm in a 1st gen though.
     
    BTBAKER likes this.
  14. Apr 4, 2023 at 12:18 PM
    #14
    Fxclm5

    Fxclm5 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2022
    Member:
    #87311
    Messages:
    463
    Lol pretty sure those k02 load range c still weighs like 15+ heavier then regular SL rated AT
     
    _none_ likes this.
  15. Apr 4, 2023 at 12:43 PM
    #15
    Bourbonator

    Bourbonator [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2021
    Member:
    #69867
    Messages:
    433
    North ID
    Vehicle:
    '23 LE CM 6.5
    BFG KO2 in 34x10.5x17 has an overall dia of 33.5, 11" width, and weighs 54.7 in D
    Toyo AT3 in 34x10.5x17 has an overall dia of 33.5, 10.6" width, and weighs 55 lbs in D
    AT3 in 285/75/17 has an overall dia of 33.9", 11.3" width, and weighs 59 lbs in C.

    There are lighter options with similar ODs and widths for 18" wheels, but they're all E rated. 18" wheels are heavier, so weight is probably a wash and you get a stiffer ride. Why not go 35? Because I like to keep it closer to stock - ETA: and I don't want all the extra rolling resistance and weight.
     
  16. Apr 4, 2023 at 12:45 PM
    #16
    _none_

    _none_ Poser

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2023
    Member:
    #94306
    Messages:
    455
    Vehicle:
    2020 DC SR5 4x4
    Pretty close.
    Stock is around 41lbs.

    K02 285/70 17 C= 51lbs, so "only" 10lbs heavier. But quite a bit heavier for 1st gens though i'd imagine.
    K02 285/70 17 E= 58lbs.
    k02 275/65 18 E= 55lbs
    K02 275/70 18 E=57lbs
     
  17. Apr 4, 2023 at 1:43 PM
    #17
    ScenicRoute

    ScenicRoute New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2021
    Member:
    #57970
    Messages:
    792
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tim
    Vehicle:
    2021 Tundra CM Nightshade
    Eibach stage 2 (JUNK), SmartCap, Airbags, CoachBuilder Stuff, Bora spacers, 35” falken AT3W tires.
    well…so does a full tank of fuel vs an empty tank or a few passengers vs just a driver. Let’s not split hairs here.
     
  18. Apr 4, 2023 at 2:09 PM
    #18
    KNABORES

    KNABORES Sarcasm incoming

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Member:
    #40572
    Messages:
    13,718
    Gender:
    Male
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    2000 Limited TRD AC 4X4 Thunder Grey 278k miles. *SOLD* 2019 Limited TRD CM 4x4
    Bilstein 5100's on the forbidden notch Husky HD rear leafs 16x8 Eagle Alloy 187's with 285/75/16 MagnaFlow 3" flow through Pioneer touchscreen with backup camera Full interior and dash LED conversion Trailer brake controller with 7 pin Bedliner coat bumpers & trim ARE Mpulse topper - Rhino Vortex rack
    Not the same thing as unsprung weight. More impactful in the rotating mass at each corner than in the tank or the bed.
     
    WFD473 and _none_ like this.
  19. Apr 4, 2023 at 2:25 PM
    #19
    ScenicRoute

    ScenicRoute New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2021
    Member:
    #57970
    Messages:
    792
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tim
    Vehicle:
    2021 Tundra CM Nightshade
    Eibach stage 2 (JUNK), SmartCap, Airbags, CoachBuilder Stuff, Bora spacers, 35” falken AT3W tires.
    I know the difference and I know what you mean…I guess I just look at it differently. Don’t care if I lose a little power or mpg. It’s a truck and I don’t drive it with my foot to the floor. Certainly aren’t going to limit my options of tires based on a few extra pounds. I also put “over-rated” tires on my trailers when given the opportunity.

    My personal experience with load e and load f tires on my 2021 has been positive. And everyone who rides in the truck comments how well it rides (it does have upgraded suspension though) But I have a 1 ton too so the tundra definitely rides better.
     
    KNABORES[QUOTED] likes this.
  20. Apr 4, 2023 at 7:19 PM
    #20
    Fxclm5

    Fxclm5 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2022
    Member:
    #87311
    Messages:
    463
    lol ive never seen such defense on E rated tires

    go take a ride on a stock truck, swap tires to E rated on same rims and go on same route

    you cant say that you would never notice, there is huge difference in ride/throttle application/braking/bodyroll/turning etc
     
    KNABORES likes this.
  21. Apr 4, 2023 at 7:42 PM
    #21
    ScenicRoute

    ScenicRoute New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2021
    Member:
    #57970
    Messages:
    792
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tim
    Vehicle:
    2021 Tundra CM Nightshade
    Eibach stage 2 (JUNK), SmartCap, Airbags, CoachBuilder Stuff, Bora spacers, 35” falken AT3W tires.
    I don’t care what anyone else buys. I’m just offering my experience. My 2021 came stock with 20” wheels and the stock tires. No idea what they are…sitting in corner of my shop. And I put 35” load f Cooper rugged treks on. No ragrets!

    Buy what you want. Run what you want. I’m just saying I don’t dismiss the tire just because of the load rating.
     
  22. Apr 4, 2023 at 7:57 PM
    #22
    Hbjeff

    Hbjeff New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2019
    Member:
    #24845
    Messages:
    5,114
    Gender:
    Male
    Huntington Beach
    Vehicle:
    2010 DC 5.7 2wd
    Trd sways, bullydog, magnaflow, sumo springs
    In my experience heavier tires alone does not affect mpg. Diameter does.

    staying in the same size but using e rated was no mpg change
     
  23. Apr 4, 2023 at 8:19 PM
    #23
    JLS in WA

    JLS in WA New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Member:
    #40610
    Messages:
    1,383
    Gender:
    Male
    Somewhere in the basalt rocks with my dogs
    Vehicle:
    2008 White DC Limited 4x4
    Drahthaar Transport Unit
    Good luck finding a LT275/70R18 in anything but load E. It’s pretty low on my give a shit meter.
     
    Terndrerrr likes this.
  24. Apr 4, 2023 at 8:58 PM
    #24
    CTundraForMe

    CTundraForMe New Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2021
    Member:
    #63550
    Messages:
    577
    my mpg isn't affected by running Es in stock size. 15.6mpg with lots of steel.
     
  25. Apr 4, 2023 at 9:09 PM
    #25
    Terndrerrr

    Terndrerrr 925000 miles to go

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2019
    Member:
    #32965
    Messages:
    6,123
    Gender:
    Male
    Music City
    Vehicle:
    6UR-FE
    RAS, 285/75 DTs, dual battery, SS3 Pro
    All of that is true, but I guess I just don’t care. It’s far more important to me to be able to go nearly anywhere I want with absolute ease. I bought my truck for particular tasks: hunting, hauling, towing, dispersed camping, off-roading. Keeping myself comfortable or retaining an extra 1-2mpg are nowhere to be found on that list.

    If there were C rated tires in the size I’m running, maybe I would try them out. But there aren’t, and I’m really happy with my setup. It eats up everything from Tennessee mud to sand to snow to SW Colorado shelf roads and high clearance required trails. And it’s decent on pavement, too. I have zero complaints, even if I can tell a difference from the stock Michelins.
     
  26. Apr 4, 2023 at 9:29 PM
    #26
    1lowlife

    1lowlife Toxic prick and pavement princess..

    Joined:
    May 4, 2016
    Member:
    #3296
    Messages:
    10,655
    First Name:
    DADA
    THE GREAT STATE OF TEXAS
    Vehicle:
    2014 MGM DC SR5
    _none_ likes this.
  27. Apr 4, 2023 at 10:37 PM
    #27
    rruff

    rruff New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2021
    Member:
    #69521
    Messages:
    981
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tundra SR DC Long
    Larger tires don't increase rolling resistance... actually the opposite.

    A new option in 315/70r17 load C, 52lbs: Also in 325/65r18 (35x13) and are D load, T speed rated, 65 lbs: [​IMG]
     
  28. Apr 4, 2023 at 11:07 PM
    #28
    KNABORES

    KNABORES Sarcasm incoming

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Member:
    #40572
    Messages:
    13,718
    Gender:
    Male
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    2000 Limited TRD AC 4X4 Thunder Grey 278k miles. *SOLD* 2019 Limited TRD CM 4x4
    Bilstein 5100's on the forbidden notch Husky HD rear leafs 16x8 Eagle Alloy 187's with 285/75/16 MagnaFlow 3" flow through Pioneer touchscreen with backup camera Full interior and dash LED conversion Trailer brake controller with 7 pin Bedliner coat bumpers & trim ARE Mpulse topper - Rhino Vortex rack
    The govt. begs to differ, and they wouldn’t lie to us!!!

    37073CB4-9C07-4A60-BABC-FE84BEDAF7D3.jpg
     
  29. Apr 4, 2023 at 11:15 PM
    #29
    txtundra311

    txtundra311 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2022
    Member:
    #86625
    Messages:
    150
    Gender:
    Male
    I’ve been very pleased with my nitto ridge grapplers e-rated in 275/70/18. I think it’s best overall tire size for most people’s needs.

    I still get 16.5 mpg combined with those tires.
    My tires are inflated to 46psi cold, and hit 51psi when i’m driving on fwy.
     
  30. Apr 4, 2023 at 11:22 PM
    #30
    rruff

    rruff New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2021
    Member:
    #69521
    Messages:
    981
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tundra SR DC Long
    Holy crap, who wrote that?! :eek2:
     
    Shanet421 and _none_ like this.

Products Discussed in

To Top