1. Welcome to Tundras.com!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tundra discussion topics
    • Transfer over your build thread from a different forum to this one
    • Communicate privately with other Tundra owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

2013, 2015 any good? Why?

Discussion in 'General Tundra Discussion' started by synergy58, Jul 20, 2023.

  1. Jul 20, 2023 at 8:45 AM
    #1
    synergy58

    synergy58 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2022
    Member:
    #73604
    Messages:
    46
    Gender:
    Male
    Somewhere between Pensacola FL and Travis AFB CA
    I am looking for a good used, lower miles, DC 4x4, and have found a 2013 and 2015 I'm considering.

    Online I see some sights will state to stay clear of ...2001-2002, 2009, 2010, 2007, 2017, and 2015. Other sights show that 2011-2013 are not good years. WHY?

    Why are there all these pros and cons about "best" and "worst" years of Tundra, to buy, for these particular years?

    Both the trucks I'm thinking about are:

    1) 2013 DC, 77k miles, fiberglass topper, SR5, cloth seats, after market rear bumper and sliders, wheels, over sized tires. Nice shape. $25k
    2) 2015 DC, 128k, fiberglass topper, Limited, clean, $28k

    What would I need to be concerned about with either year? Also, what about the pricing?

    Insight please. Thanks!
     
  2. Jul 20, 2023 at 8:54 AM
    #2
    MEWaters

    MEWaters New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2020
    Member:
    #48052
    Messages:
    714
    Gender:
    Male
    Maine
    Vehicle:
    07 2UZFE TRD OR; previous 02 AC 323k
    Eibach pro suspension Nitro 4.88 with Auburn Pro LSD and PTFE diff bushings Level 8 MK6 18x9 SAIS bypass JBA cat back Scangauge 2 Diode dynamic fogs. LED heads Husky liners
    Lol my 02 had 324k needing nothing but timing belts and water pumps.
    07 running great at 202k
    Find one with verifiable service history and buy whatever you like
     
    synergy58[OP] likes this.
  3. Jul 20, 2023 at 8:57 AM
    #3
    D4x4TRD

    D4x4TRD New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2019
    Member:
    #32376
    Messages:
    531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Định
    Va beach, VA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Sr5 DC TRD 4x4 Blaaaaaack baby 4.6liter
    Blacked out front grill badge Bigger tires 305/60r18 Tonneau cover
    I have a 2012 DC sr5. Nothing wrong with mine. Ì bought used for $22,000 in 2018. A little rust in the bed that was hidden by the drop in liner. Still running great. I think 2013 was the last year of the 2nd gen style. So all the kinks should be worked out on that. 2015 should be good too. It’s got the 2.5 gen style body. So that’s the main difference between the : your looking at. So boils down to which body style you prefer and check for rust. Personally I like the 2nd gen body style the best. Good luck.
     
    synergy58[OP] likes this.
  4. Jul 20, 2023 at 9:09 AM
    #4
    synergy58

    synergy58 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2022
    Member:
    #73604
    Messages:
    46
    Gender:
    Male
    Somewhere between Pensacola FL and Travis AFB CA
    The 2013 has a 4.6 V8. I'm only familiar with the 4.7. How's the 4.6, is it a good motor, or should I stick w a 5.7, which is in the 2015? any knowledge?
     
  5. Jul 20, 2023 at 9:13 AM
    #5
    Hbjeff

    Hbjeff New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2019
    Member:
    #24845
    Messages:
    5,119
    Gender:
    Male
    Huntington Beach
    Vehicle:
    2010 DC 5.7 2wd
    Trd sways, bullydog, magnaflow, sumo springs
    Wouldnt concern me. Brand new trucks break. Shit happens. Those gen trucks are relatively reliable
     
  6. Jul 20, 2023 at 9:23 AM
    #6
    Bergmen

    Bergmen New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Member:
    #12418
    Messages:
    1,175
    Gender:
    Male
    Ukiah, California
    Vehicle:
    2018 Blazing Blue Pearl DC 4X2 SR5
    The 4.6 is simply a smaller version of the 5.7, completely different engine design from the 4.7. No timing belt (chain drive camshafts, hydraulic valve actuators). Around 310 hp IIRC.

    Really the only realistic downside (except 70 hp less than the 5.7) is resale potential. 5.7 is BY FAR the preferred engine when going to sell. If you are going to consider the 2013, push for a lower price.

    Dan
     
  7. Jul 20, 2023 at 9:24 AM
    #7
    PermaFrostTRD

    PermaFrostTRD Tumescent Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2016
    Member:
    #4612
    Messages:
    3,106
    Gender:
    Male
    Northern NY
    Vehicle:
    2019 CrewMax MGM Grocery Getter
    Poor man's limited; Fox 2.0 & 5100s; 285/70 RG
    Both are solid trucks. I cant speak to the pricing as we are still affected by the whole crap of the last 3 years so that's keeping things somewhat artificially inflated, but those prices dont seem outrageous.

    If you can, go test drive both and see which one blows your skirt up. Cant really go wrong with either
     
  8. Jul 20, 2023 at 9:26 AM
    #8
    synergy58

    synergy58 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2022
    Member:
    #73604
    Messages:
    46
    Gender:
    Male
    Somewhere between Pensacola FL and Travis AFB CA
    What differences do think I would notice between my now '05 w 4.7 Vs the '13 w 4.6, as far as power and towing capacity?
     
  9. Jul 20, 2023 at 9:34 AM
    #9
    bfunke

    bfunke Tundra Curmudgeon

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2019
    Member:
    #37321
    Messages:
    2,422
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bryan
    South Carolina
    Vehicle:
    2018 SR-5 CM 5.7, 2000 SR-5 AC 4.7L
    4.7 is a beloved engine but has a few known concerns - timing belt, exhaust manifold leaks, starter contacts burning and secondary air injection pump failure. 4.6 is a newer design basically a destroked 5.7 with cast iron block. It has higher compression than the 4.7 and water cooled EGR. It makes more power than the 4.7 but it lives in the shadow of 5.7 and is not popular with most buyers.
     
    D4x4TRD and synergy58[OP] like this.
  10. Jul 20, 2023 at 9:35 AM
    #10
    ACDC2ZZTop

    ACDC2ZZTop Rock n Roll!

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2020
    Member:
    #53697
    Messages:
    384
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Travis
    Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2012 MGM Tundra double cab 5.7L V8
    All cosmetic so far see my posts in 2nd gen Black out chrome in progress….
    Bought my 2012 5.7 3 years ago with 85k and rounds like new. Love it.
     
  11. Jul 20, 2023 at 9:37 AM
    #11
    synergy58

    synergy58 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2022
    Member:
    #73604
    Messages:
    46
    Gender:
    Male
    Somewhere between Pensacola FL and Travis AFB CA
    Ok, thanks all. Sounds like I best stick with a 5.7. 4.6 has less towing cap. than my 4.7, by a few hundred lbs.
     
  12. Jul 20, 2023 at 9:40 AM
    #12
    Tbrandt

    Tbrandt I read it on an internet forum, it must be true.

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2021
    Member:
    #65976
    Messages:
    498
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tristan
    Kansas City
    Vehicle:
    2021 SR5 DC TRD Off-Road
    Kenwood DMX907S + Maestro iDatalink RR2 Kenwood DRV-N520 dash cam Kicker Door Speakers TRD rear sway bar Firestone airbags + Daystar cradles Setrab oil cooler, OEM thermostat and hard lines Century High-C topper Bedrug Helmholtz resonator on stock exhaust Sound deadened + insulated cab Platinum 20s, hwy tires Viair 400P
    I would strongly recommend going with the 5.7L over the 4.6L. Better in every way except for a loss of ~2 mpg. You'll never regret having the extra 70hp and 80 ft-lb of torque.
     
  13. Jul 20, 2023 at 11:11 AM
    #13
    Bergmen

    Bergmen New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Member:
    #12418
    Messages:
    1,175
    Gender:
    Male
    Ukiah, California
    Vehicle:
    2018 Blazing Blue Pearl DC 4X2 SR5
    Very true except I believe the 4.6 has an aluminum block (the 5.7 has).

    I owned a 2006 Tundra (bought new) for 12 years and 225,000 trouble-free miles. Yes, changing the timing belt every 90k miles was an expensive PITA (and I did my own work). My daughter bought it from me when I got my 2018 and it has more than 300k miles on it now. Starter just went out and it is a PITA to replace since it is under the intake manifold. Loved my 2006 while I owned it.

    Dan
     
    synergy58[OP] likes this.
  14. Jul 20, 2023 at 11:15 AM
    #14
    Bergmen

    Bergmen New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Member:
    #12418
    Messages:
    1,175
    Gender:
    Male
    Ukiah, California
    Vehicle:
    2018 Blazing Blue Pearl DC 4X2 SR5
    Of course we will need a video of that to confirm. The theater is filling up right now in anticipation...

    Dan
     
    PermaFrostTRD[QUOTED] likes this.
  15. Jul 20, 2023 at 11:42 AM
    #15
    D4x4TRD

    D4x4TRD New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2019
    Member:
    #32376
    Messages:
    531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Định
    Va beach, VA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Sr5 DC TRD 4x4 Blaaaaaack baby 4.6liter
    Blacked out front grill badge Bigger tires 305/60r18 Tonneau cover
    Hey mine’s a 4.6l and I don’t miss the power I never had. Hehe
     
    synergy58[OP] likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top