1. Welcome to Tundras.com!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tundra discussion topics
    • Transfer over your build thread from a different forum to this one
    • Communicate privately with other Tundra owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Mandrel-Bent Air Intake Tubes for our Turbos?

Discussion in '3rd Gen Tundras (2022+)' started by Taikowaza, Sep 6, 2022.

  1. Sep 6, 2022 at 1:39 PM
    #1
    Taikowaza

    Taikowaza [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2021
    Member:
    #69581
    Messages:
    577
    I usually use zero-restriction air tubes in my Toyotas for the air intake, I have noticed improvements in torque and response. For the 22 Tundras, while my truck did come with the TRD filters, I don't really like the air tubes with all of their restrictions/"folds". I have looked into options and did see the AFE MOMENTUM GT SERIES AIR INTAKE, but that is way overkill for me. I do not want to entirely replace the air boxes or filters (especially not for over $600!). I'm just looking for the tubes. If you have seen any options I'd love some links or guidance. Thanks!
     
  2. Sep 6, 2022 at 1:49 PM
    #2
    mass-hole

    mass-hole New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2019
    Member:
    #34378
    Messages:
    2,045
    If I had to guess, Toyota did just fine on the intake. Not to say its good up to 600 hp, but I bet for the stock tune it works extremely well and probably better that any aftermarket unit. If you were chasing maximum HP then maybe an aftermarket unit would outperform it up top. Just because its not a straight mandrel bent tube doesnt mean its not the best setup for turbo spool up and mid range power.

    Also, I really dont like AFE. They are overpriced and underperform in my experience. I had an AFe intercooler on my F150 Ecoboost and it was a complete piece of crap and is probably the most expensive unit out there by a couple hundred dollars. I replaced it with a unit that goes for literally 1/2 the price and it performs significantly better. I also have an AFe intake on my Lexus GX and again, the price is ridiculous and the quality is not up to par with the S&B intake on my F150, which cost 2/3 the price even when I got the AFe on sale during black friday.
     
    Taikowaza[OP] likes this.
  3. Sep 6, 2022 at 1:55 PM
    #3
    DFS

    DFS New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2022
    Member:
    #81787
    Messages:
    477
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2022 Capstone Tundra
    There's just no need to mess with the intake system on these trucks unless you are doing a full build out of the motor. Leave it alone.
     
  4. Sep 6, 2022 at 2:53 PM
    #4
    eddiefromcali

    eddiefromcali New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2022
    Member:
    #75818
    Messages:
    3,015
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Eddie
    Vehicle:
    2022 Tundra Platinum
    100% Stock
    have any proof?
     
  5. Sep 6, 2022 at 3:03 PM
    #5
    DFS

    DFS New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2022
    Member:
    #81787
    Messages:
    477
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2022 Capstone Tundra
    Lots of experience with tuning and being around high performance Raptors. Intake has never been a problem, and is engineered for the best mix of longevity/performance. OEM engineer's do an excellent job and spend more money on R&D than any of us could put into our own research concerning the intakes. I'll let their results speak for themselves. You want easy power then upgrade intercoolers, turbos, remove exhaust restrictions.
     
  6. Sep 6, 2022 at 3:04 PM
    #6
    eddiefromcali

    eddiefromcali New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2022
    Member:
    #75818
    Messages:
    3,015
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Eddie
    Vehicle:
    2022 Tundra Platinum
    100% Stock
    so the short answer is no
     
  7. Sep 6, 2022 at 3:10 PM
    #7
    mass-hole

    mass-hole New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2019
    Member:
    #34378
    Messages:
    2,045
    Do you have any proof its worth wasting time and money on random intake tubes that are not engineer by the largest auto company in the world and who know the exact specifications of their turbos? That seems to be the real question.
     
    22PlatWCP and DFS like this.
  8. Sep 6, 2022 at 3:12 PM
    #8
    eddiefromcali

    eddiefromcali New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2022
    Member:
    #75818
    Messages:
    3,015
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Eddie
    Vehicle:
    2022 Tundra Platinum
    100% Stock
    Im not the one making any baseless claims. Im simply asking for proof of a statement.
     
  9. Sep 6, 2022 at 3:16 PM
    #9
    Winning8

    Winning8 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2019
    Member:
    #32819
    Messages:
    2,039
    Gender:
    Male
    Da Bay Area
    Vehicle:
    2019 MGM DC 4x4 SR5
    Mumba 18x9 ET 12, BFG KO2, FOX suspension, diamond back HD cover w/ rack, LED head & fog light bulb, TRD rear sway bar, timbren enhancement, RAS helper spring, avs auto shade, Carhartt front seat cover, bench seat cover
    no proof at all, but giving turbo a few more psi is way cheaper and easier then redo all those piping...lol
     
  10. Sep 6, 2022 at 3:18 PM
    #10
    mass-hole

    mass-hole New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2019
    Member:
    #34378
    Messages:
    2,045
    So no then?
     
    DFS likes this.
  11. Sep 6, 2022 at 3:25 PM
    #11
    DFS

    DFS New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2022
    Member:
    #81787
    Messages:
    477
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2022 Capstone Tundra
    Next time I won't make any claims without an engineered white paper. Now I hope you can provide your data. Since I at least have a plethora of anecdotal evidence available. Reach out to someone like Goosetuned, who sells tunes and not intakes like AMS or Cobb. Then ask what is recommended to see reliable horsepower gains, and intakes are almost never the answer.
     
  12. Sep 6, 2022 at 3:26 PM
    #12
    eddiefromcali

    eddiefromcali New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2022
    Member:
    #75818
    Messages:
    3,015
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Eddie
    Vehicle:
    2022 Tundra Platinum
    100% Stock
  13. Sep 6, 2022 at 3:27 PM
    #13
    eddiefromcali

    eddiefromcali New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2022
    Member:
    #75818
    Messages:
    3,015
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Eddie
    Vehicle:
    2022 Tundra Platinum
    100% Stock
    different platform. You have zero experience with these engines. Im not saying theres something to gain, Im simply saying you really dont know for certain and have no actual proof to back up your claim.
     
  14. Sep 6, 2022 at 4:00 PM
    #14
    Taikowaza

    Taikowaza [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2021
    Member:
    #69581
    Messages:
    577
    Hey dudes I really apologize for causing this strife! Obviously we all have opinions and experiences with intakes and I definitely think there’s room for all of us to agree (even if to disagree!). Personally I saw (what I personally perceived to be) real, tangible improvements on my 4runner and Sequoia when I swapped the stock constrictive air input tubes with less constrictive tubes. Those baffles, IMHO create blockages in the flow and result in less performance. I don’t want to swap the filters or boxes but I would be interested in replacement tubes only when those become available. I agree that Toyota invests more than we ever can in R&D! I also feel that Toyota sometimes leans on the side of caution and conservatism in their design, where I have really enjoyed adding headers, exhausts, intake manifolds and a ton more to boost power, and I’m excited to do the same w/this Gen Tundra, excited to learn what options are out there! Cheers dudes!!
     
    eddiefromcali likes this.
  15. Sep 6, 2022 at 5:13 PM
    #15
    Silver17

    Silver17 Used, but returned and sold as new member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2021
    Member:
    #68847
    Messages:
    3,553
    Gender:
    Male
    Eastern PA
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD 4x4 Harrop SC
    Eibach pro 2.0s, toytec progressive mini AAL, ARE CX cap, Airlift bags, Harrop Supercharger, 650cc injectors, 77.5mm pulley, SABM, TRD Dual exhaust, Solid Offroad motor mounts, J&L catchcan, Powertrax LSD, FN BFDs with 285/75r18 Kenda R/Ts.
    I don’t have a 3rd gen so I can’t speak from experience, but in general principle I’d have to agree with the sentiment that the stock intake probably isn’t holding you back in power department. I only say that because I’m making 180-200hp over stock with my truck and it’s using the bone stock intake box pulling all of the air from a 3.5” hole just like the NA trucks do. I still make the proper amount of boost quoted by the manufacturer with the pulley I’m using. I do plan to upgrade to a larger intake, but not because it’s a restriction but because the increased airflow across the MAF in the stock sized tube is greater than it can accurately read unless I get a larger tube and scale for it. With forced induction, if the turbos/supercharger want air than they will probably pull it one way or another.
     
  16. Sep 6, 2022 at 5:46 PM
    #16
    GO.XPLRE

    GO.XPLRE IG: @go.xplre

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2021
    Member:
    #65790
    Messages:
    106
    26.579599, -111.754213
    Vehicle:
    ‘22 TRDP

Products Discussed in

To Top