1. Welcome to Tundras.com!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tundra discussion topics
    • Transfer over your build thread from a different forum to this one
    • Communicate privately with other Tundra owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

2015 5.7 TBI Upgrade

Discussion in 'Performance and Tuning' started by printmonger, Feb 26, 2022.

  1. Feb 26, 2022 at 6:41 AM
    #1
    printmonger

    printmonger [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2022
    Member:
    #75119
    Messages:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mark
    Vehicle:
    2015 Tundra 5.7
    Bone freaking stock
    I have a customer wanting to put a larger TBI unit on his truck stating he will get better gas mileage out of it. Question; what size is the stock TBI unit (76mm?), is his reasoning correct, what size should he upgrade to, where do I get one from, other upgrades needed with a larger TBI???
     
  2. Feb 26, 2022 at 7:17 AM
    #2
    frichco228

    frichco228 Valued Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2020
    Member:
    #40952
    Messages:
    5,090
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Frank
    Virginia
    Vehicle:
    2016 Crewmax 4WD, TRD Offroad
    Eibach Pro Truck Stage 2 suspension, HD RAS, 285/75-18 Nokian Outpost AT, LoPro bed cover, TRD rear sway bar, DD 10 inch exhaust, and various other goodies
    Unsure of any reason to upgrade that unless he is running a SC. I have not heard of any benefits on a stock motor and don't know of anyone running one on a stock truck. I think there are 90mm TB available. No help on what it may take to make that work, other changes or upgrades needed.
     
  3. Feb 27, 2022 at 5:40 AM
    #3
    ZPhilip

    ZPhilip Custom title here

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2019
    Member:
    #36383
    Messages:
    1,423
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Philip
    West Chester, PA
    Vehicle:
    2015 Platinum Super White Crewmax
    Harrop supercharger, TRD Pro Fox suspension, CB +1 shackles, 295/70-18 Toyo ATIII, TRD Pro forged rims
    If it helped MPG, Toyota would have put it on the engine.
     
  4. Feb 28, 2022 at 7:16 PM
    #4
    prevent

    prevent New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2020
    Member:
    #43727
    Messages:
    127
    Vehicle:
    2014 5.7L Tundra SR5 DC
    TRD Catback Stillen CAI DAP Tune Tow Mirrors Light sensor Dashcam TRD Pro Grill LED Interior lights + DRL’s
    This. Toyota really did everything they could to push MPG as far as it could go, that’s why our oil filter housing is plastic.
     
  5. Mar 1, 2022 at 10:14 AM
    #5
    4firemandan

    4firemandan Superduper Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2018
    Member:
    #17394
    Messages:
    179
    First Name:
    Dan
    SWFL
    Vehicle:
    2016 Crewmax 4x4, 5.7
    TRD Supercharger, Ported SC inlet, RCF TB, 4.5” intake, WMI, 2.38 pulley, custom tune, DW660 inj, aeromotive fpr, msd boost-a-pump
    All a larger intake will do for N/A is cause it to run lean for a millisecond before the computer uses fuel trims to add fuel back in.

    It may throw a dash light if it consistently sees high positive trims and it's irrelevant to mpg because it's going to always shoot for 14.7 to 1 anyway.

    If he were to correct the MAF table to match the new intake then everything would be the same as stock (fuel trim-wise, fueling wise) with just a slightly better throttle response. Again, no notable change to mileage.
     
    HulkSmurf14 and nobodyintexas like this.
  6. Mar 1, 2022 at 11:18 PM
    #6
    Chad D.

    Chad D. New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Member:
    #26010
    Messages:
    1,431
    Gender:
    Male
    Western Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2018 CrewMax Platinum

    Damn Toyota and their engine management systems!

    That said, I agree 100%. No appreciable advantage other than the mileage gained by reducing weight from a wallet….
     
    4firemandan[QUOTED] likes this.
  7. Mar 2, 2022 at 4:17 AM
    #7
    4firemandan

    4firemandan Superduper Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2018
    Member:
    #17394
    Messages:
    179
    First Name:
    Dan
    SWFL
    Vehicle:
    2016 Crewmax 4x4, 5.7
    TRD Supercharger, Ported SC inlet, RCF TB, 4.5” intake, WMI, 2.38 pulley, custom tune, DW660 inj, aeromotive fpr, msd boost-a-pump
    Lol. The ol wallet weight reduction. I'm a pro at that one! Haha.

    If it makes you feel any better, GM and Ford and the others would all work pretty much the same way.

    A clean, easy flowing filter and an easy flowing exhaust would be the best bet.

    I guess in that respect a larger intake would technically be less restrictive and theoretically "help"but I think it's not anywhere close to a noticeable improvement. Even a good air filter is minimal and that's probably a much much better help than an intake.

    Once you start talking top end performance the larger intake would matter. That's the real purpose to this kind of upgrade in my opinion.
     
    10TundraSR5 likes this.
  8. Mar 2, 2022 at 4:40 AM
    #8
    10TundraSR5

    10TundraSR5 Happy Tundra owner

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Member:
    #20824
    Messages:
    854
    Gender:
    Male
    Tennessee
    Vehicle:
    2010 Black Tundra SR5
    Curse you Perry the Platypus!
    These people pretty much nailed it.
     
  9. Mar 3, 2022 at 1:44 PM
    #9
    HulkSmurf14

    HulkSmurf14 ...Weighted Average...

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2019
    Member:
    #34377
    Messages:
    2,549
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra Limited
    Tastefully enhanced...
    Add some LT headers on NA and your client will smile at his 1-2mpg gains...
     
  10. Mar 3, 2022 at 2:37 PM
    #10
    GAknight

    GAknight New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2017
    Member:
    #8933
    Messages:
    1,717
    Gender:
    Male
    Shade of a Pine, GA
    Vehicle:
    '14 TSS 4x4
    Too many…scratch that…not done yet.
    These two nailed it. i played around with this a few years ago. There was a similar discussion a while back about this, here.

    First attempt was porting and polishing the tb, then looked at the larger one by Prospeed, which requires an adapter.
    Even if you could run a tune/remap for the MAF sensor, the problem is still the intake itself…between the design of the inlet tube and the internal runners. Without a s/c application, a larger tb would be a potential waste, if not a problem for n/a application.

    if you want ‘cooler’ air, consider the tb bypass mod (search the forum for it).
    As mentioned, for n/a applications, one of the best go-to (proven) hp gains is LT headers and @dirtydeeds dual race exhaust.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top