1. Welcome to Tundras.com!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tundra discussion topics
    • Transfer over your build thread from a different forum to this one
    • Communicate privately with other Tundra owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

New isn't always better...

Discussion in '2.5 Gen Tundras (2014-2021)' started by Railroad 07, Aug 30, 2021.

  1. Aug 30, 2021 at 12:27 PM
    #1
    Railroad 07

    Railroad 07 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2021
    Member:
    #64364
    Messages:
    42
    Gender:
    Male
    Georgia
    Vehicle:
    White 2021 trd pro
    20210830_150511.jpg Here's a great example of failed promises.

    2018 3rd gen tacoma averaging 13.7mpg

    They threw away the fantastic 4.0l that had plenty of torque / acceleration for a new updated "more fuel efficient" 3.5l .
    Literally less road power in every way with the same shitty mileage...

    Don't get me wrong I'm sure the reliability is there but damn man I've had this truck since new and put 39k on it and it's a complete dog. Mind you it's a 6sp manual so I don't have any of the transmission nannies.

    I'll be interested to see what really happens to the new tundra to please the epa gods. Hopefully it's not the same type of "upgrade" the tacoma got...
     
    Cpl_Punishment and 2mchfun like this.
  2. Aug 30, 2021 at 1:33 PM
    #2
    Summitroad

    Summitroad New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2020
    Member:
    #54224
    Messages:
    34
    Gender:
    Male
    I agree, the 3rd gen Taco was a total flop, the 2nd gen was far better truck. I know, I owned a 2005 and now a 2016, and the reliability is not there any more. One example; Originally this 3.5 had a aluminum water bypass between the heads on the back of the engine, now is made out of plastic and they are breaking, and it not an easy fix. Mine broke at worst time, when two wild fires were burning near by the house, and we knew were going to evacuate, as fires were advancing towards the property.

    Lucky I found a 2021 Tundra, and bough it as it was been delivered to the dealer. Few days later we had to evacuate the property thru logging roads, lots of hills and curves. Since the 2007 Tundra has a transmission cooler we loaded it with the heaviest trailer. Did not wanted to risk overheating the transmission of the new Tundra. As we all know the cooler is one of the many things that has been taken out of the Tundras

    I have said it before, and I will say it again. Since Mike Sweers became Chief engineer, the Tacoma and Tundra are going backwards, every year things were taken out and prices went up

    Both Tundras side by side, The 2007 is basically a ranch truck, it has been a reliable and dependable work horse, and even is just a SR5, it has more standards features than the 2021 Limited TRD OR
    Just smoke in the back, left of the picture, bulldozer work, fire breaks

    20210813_134153.jpg
     
  3. Sep 1, 2021 at 3:43 AM
    #3
    Squatting Pigeon

    Squatting Pigeon Squattingpigeon.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2018
    Member:
    #14443
    Messages:
    56,309
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Holden
    North Texas
    Vehicle:
    4Runner | GR Corolla
    While I despised the driving characteristics of my 2016 Tacoma (automatic), I was able to pull down 18-21 MPG. In south Florida no less o_O
     
    AZBoatHauler likes this.
  4. Sep 1, 2021 at 7:23 AM
    #4
    Elduder

    Elduder New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2017
    Member:
    #7206
    Messages:
    1,399
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chris
    o_O

    Had 2 3rd gen Tacoma’s, the first was a 2016 and was a lemon.

    Both had better gearing and acceleration than our 5th gen 4Runner.

    Average on my 4Runner is 16-17 mpg mixed, my Tacoma’s were the same.
     
  5. Sep 1, 2021 at 9:48 AM
    #5
    Chip_Tundra

    Chip_Tundra New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2020
    Member:
    #44310
    Messages:
    277
    Gender:
    Male
    After talking to someone who for sure has actual knowledge of the new engines (and the trucks in general), I'm pretty sure we won't be disappointed. We both agreed that engineering a more efficient and powerful V8 would be preferred.

    The everso tightening of EPA/CAFE restrictions has however got engineers thinking outside the box by creating a great V6 platform. I had to remind myself that turbos of today aren't the same as those produced even 5 years ago. The turbos will be a great fit for the new engine, and we'll still have more power to do the things a full size truck is meant to do.

    The mileage aspect is irrelevant to me as I never expect trucks to be gas savers anyway. Either way, I can't wait to see how the new Tundra does, especially with the new transmission they've got it mated to.

    I'm actually waiting for the new iForce Max (TT V6 Hybrid) that's going to be put into the Sequoia, standard. I was on the fence, but my friend assured me that these new trucks will blow everyone away.
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2021
  6. Sep 1, 2021 at 10:03 AM
    #6
    Jhon

    Jhon New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2021
    Member:
    #66794
    Messages:
    219
    Gender:
    Male
    On the Oregon Trail
    Vehicle:
    2021 SR5 TRD OR
    My 2nd Gen Tacoma with the 4.0 and 6 speed manual got 13-14 pretty regularly. I think if the 1GR-FE were paired with a 6 or 8 speed auto it would see low 20s on the highway while being a much nicer driving truck. The torque curve on the 1GR-FE was perfect for the Tacoma.
     
    Railroad 07[OP] and Chip_Tundra like this.
  7. Sep 1, 2021 at 10:07 AM
    #7
    AZBoatHauler

    AZBoatHauler SSEM#140 / 2.5 gen plebe

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2019
    Member:
    #34576
    Messages:
    9,081
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Adam
    So.Arizona
    Vehicle:
    2017 CrewMax 4x4, 2017 LandCruiser, 2005 Sequoia 4x4
    Demello / SOB Fab Bumpers, SuperWinch, WKOR sliders, RCI skids, Baja Designs lighting, Billy 6112 and 5160 w/ CB +2, JL Audio with Alpine HU, DD 10" Exhaust, LED headlights, Rago fab mounts, 35” BFG, HAM radio
    Are they using the 8 speed used in the LC?
     
  8. Sep 1, 2021 at 10:08 AM
    #8
    Chip_Tundra

    Chip_Tundra New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2020
    Member:
    #44310
    Messages:
    277
    Gender:
    Male
    Won't disclose out of respect to my friend.
     
  9. Sep 1, 2021 at 10:18 AM
    #9
    JDR76

    JDR76 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2021
    Member:
    #64642
    Messages:
    557
    Gender:
    Male
    WA
    Vehicle:
    2021 1794 TRD OFF ROAD
    I had a 2011 Tacoma with the 4.0 and the 6 speed manual, and eventually went to a 2020 Tacoma with the 3.5 and the 6 speed auto. Because I went from manual to auto, it's not a direct/fair comparison. I was very happy with the drivetrain in my 2011. No complaints at all. I also didn't mind the 3.5 in the 2020, though my mileage was no better than the 4.0. Pretty much the exact same. My issue with the 2020 was the transmission gearing and programming. They updated the programming for 2020, which did make it better, but couldn't make up for the gearing. That transmission is just geared for mileage and not power. It was, in my opinion, a good engine paired to a poor transmission for the job.

    I am not at all worried about the power output of the V6TT. I just hope they don't neuter it with the transmission.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top