Ridgelander vs diamondback covers

I'm looking at getting either a diamondback or undercover ridgelander cover and am looking for a little guidance from the group.

I want to be able to put a rooftop tent on whichever cover I get and will typically use it for carrying bikes, SUPs, and light cargo.

There are a few pros and cons with each option. If I go with the diamondback I'll probably spring for the HD version which is most likely overkill for what I need, but I rather have the extra capacity and not need it than need it and not have it.

I like the idea that the ridgelander comes with a rack system and can carry a decent amount of weight, although it doesn't seem as rugged as the diamondback.

Feedback on either or a reasonable alternative is appreciated.