1. Welcome to Tundras.com!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tundra discussion topics
    • Transfer over your build thread from a different forum to this one
    • Communicate privately with other Tundra owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

What octane gas at high altitude?

Discussion in '3rd Gen Tundras (2022+)' started by Smitty1701, Jan 23, 2022.

  1. Jan 23, 2022 at 3:53 PM
    #1
    Smitty1701

    Smitty1701 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2021
    Member:
    #70214
    Messages:
    15
    What octane gas is everyone using at altitude? Here in CO basic gas is 85 and wondering if anyone else is using that at higher altitudes without any problems?
     
  2. Jan 23, 2022 at 4:02 PM
    #2
    Johnsonman

    Johnsonman New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Member:
    #39132
    Messages:
    1,205
    Gender:
    Male
    Austin
    Vehicle:
    Sequoia
    LED headlamps/fogs; interior footlamps.
    I've driven several different vehicles up and down I70 west of Denver, no problems other than lower power output on naturally aspirated machines, turbos and chargers are essential (to me) above about 6K altitude.
     
  3. Jan 23, 2022 at 4:26 PM
    #3
    ColoradoTJ

    ColoradoTJ Certified tow LEO Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2016
    Member:
    #2766
    Messages:
    35,622
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    LML 3500HD
    Calibrated Power 5 Tune pack, Allison 1000 tune, PPE deep trans pan, Cold/Hot CAC pipes, Banks CAI, PCV reroute, resonator delete, S&B 62 gal fuel tank, B&W GN hitch
    I would highly recommend you read your owners manual. 87 octane is what is called for…minimum.
     
  4. Jan 23, 2022 at 4:27 PM
    #4
    Smitty1701

    Smitty1701 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2021
    Member:
    #70214
    Messages:
    15
    thanks for the reply! So sounds like I shouldn’t have any problems with the tundra using 85 octane.
     
  5. Jan 23, 2022 at 4:28 PM
    #5
    Smitty1701

    Smitty1701 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2021
    Member:
    #70214
    Messages:
    15
    Yup that’s what the manual says but there’s also a reason why 85 is “regular” gas at high altitude versus 87 at sea level.
     
    Ericsopa likes this.
  6. Jan 23, 2022 at 4:31 PM
    #6
    ColoradoTJ

    ColoradoTJ Certified tow LEO Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2016
    Member:
    #2766
    Messages:
    35,622
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    LML 3500HD
    Calibrated Power 5 Tune pack, Allison 1000 tune, PPE deep trans pan, Cold/Hot CAC pipes, Banks CAI, PCV reroute, resonator delete, S&B 62 gal fuel tank, B&W GN hitch
    Yes, it was designed for carbureted motors at high elevation. I wouldn’t use it in a turbo application.
     
    SC4333, NewImprovedRon, DFS and 3 others like this.
  7. Jan 23, 2022 at 4:56 PM
    #7
    1stgentundradriver

    1stgentundradriver Each sticker adds at least 5hp

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2020
    Member:
    #49798
    Messages:
    422
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Josh
    Silverdale Washington
    Vehicle:
    2006 DC 4x4 Limited
    A few
    I always thought to use higher octane while towing because there is more stress on the motor. Just like climbing in elevation…there is more stress on the engine. I would use the highest octane possible with a turbo’d engine. Please let me know if I am wrong.
     
    Mike59 and Russ_S like this.
  8. Jan 23, 2022 at 4:56 PM
    #8
    Coal Dragger

    Coal Dragger New Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2021
    Member:
    #63259
    Messages:
    2,922
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2007 White Double Cab Limited 5.7L 4X4
    I wanted a faster vehicle so I also bought a Chevy SS... because 4 door sedans with big V8’s are hilarious.
    What model year Tundra are you driving?

    If it is a 2022 model it will have turbochargers on it. The turbochargers don’t care what altitude you are at, if there is enough air available to produce positive intake manifold pressure once the turbine side (hot side) of that turbo spins fast enough then your altitude is meaningless. The turbochargers effectively compensate for or eliminate altitude as a limit on power output.

    Your naturally aspirated engines running at 3,000ft above sea level or higher will be OK on 85 Octane assuming they’re designed to run on 87 Octane at sea level. They’re not sucking in air at 14.7lbs/sq-in like they would be at sea level; at 3,000ft atmospheric air pressure is nominally 13.2lbs/sq-in, and it continues to drop the higher you go. For example TFL Truck starts their Ike Gaunlet testing high enough air pressure is just above 10PSI and ends just below 10PSI.

    A turbocharger capable of positive manifold pressure will not be safe using a lower grade of fuel. The engine will be using air at a higher pressure than sea level all the time under boost regardless of altitudes an internal combustion engine is capable of running at. Most modern turbocharged engines can make more boost than they are tuned to use and bleed off the excess capacity via the wastegate to prevent over boost. As the altitude get higher and the ambient air pressure reduces the wastegate has more than enough range to compensate by not bleeding off as much pressure. So the system still makes full boost most of the time. If the turbo engine is tuned to make 15lbs/sq-in of boost at sea level, it’s going to very likely make it at 10,000ft too by spinning a bit faster and not opening the wastegate as much or at all. So if the truck calls for 87 Octane feed it 87 Octane at a minimum.
     
  9. Jan 23, 2022 at 4:56 PM
    #9
    Russ_S

    Russ_S New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2022
    Member:
    #72730
    Messages:
    31
    Gender:
    Male
    Central New York
    Vehicle:
    2023 Tundra 1794 TRD Off Road
    I would never use it in a modern turbo vehicle. Here is a video explaining some of the science why not to: https://youtu.be/kJyd6C99_3g
     
  10. Jan 23, 2022 at 5:11 PM
    #10
    ColoradoTJ

    ColoradoTJ Certified tow LEO Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2016
    Member:
    #2766
    Messages:
    35,622
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    LML 3500HD
    Calibrated Power 5 Tune pack, Allison 1000 tune, PPE deep trans pan, Cold/Hot CAC pipes, Banks CAI, PCV reroute, resonator delete, S&B 62 gal fuel tank, B&W GN hitch
    That’s a good video that explains what’s going on and why you shouldn’t use it for this application.

    One of my old work buddies always ran 85 in his SC Xterra. I’m surprised he never had issues….that he knew of.
     
  11. Jan 23, 2022 at 5:18 PM
    #11
    Black Wolf

    Black Wolf Bigfoot Hunter, Sasquatch too, but not Yeti

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2014
    Member:
    #378
    Messages:
    40,012
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Aurora CO
    Vehicle:
    2022 Nissan Frontier SV 4X4
    TuwaPro rack, Z1 Offroad stuff, NISMO suspension stuff, FlowmasterFX Extreme exhaust, AIS, OVS, J&L can, other goodies on the way
    This^^^^ My Frontier calls for 87 too. Buy top tier 87 fuel. FYI...Sam's Club doesn't sell 87 here in Colorado. I never buy fuel there.......
     
    ColoradoTJ[QUOTED] and Russ_S like this.
  12. Jan 23, 2022 at 5:39 PM
    #12
    xc_tc

    xc_tc New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2021
    Member:
    #72329
    Messages:
    896
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah… use the minimum recommended 87 octane. Even at 5000 ft elevation, the cylinder pressures are nearly the same as at sea level due to the turbo so you’ll get knock with 85 octane.
     
    Smitty1701[OP] likes this.
  13. Jan 23, 2022 at 5:44 PM
    #13
    Black Wolf

    Black Wolf Bigfoot Hunter, Sasquatch too, but not Yeti

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2014
    Member:
    #378
    Messages:
    40,012
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Aurora CO
    Vehicle:
    2022 Nissan Frontier SV 4X4
    TuwaPro rack, Z1 Offroad stuff, NISMO suspension stuff, FlowmasterFX Extreme exhaust, AIS, OVS, J&L can, other goodies on the way
    Both of my non turbo 5.7 Tunnies hauled ass over LaVeta Pass, 9413 ft, loaded down with camping gear in the bed and hauling rock on my 17ft trailer. Always had to back off near the top. Never ever noticed lower output. Got scary actually at times with the power...my property is at 8300 ft. A bit north of 6K.
     
    Mike59 likes this.
  14. Jan 23, 2022 at 5:57 PM
    #14
    Uhhhh....

    Uhhhh.... New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2018
    Member:
    #21938
    Messages:
    1,178
    First Name:
    Dave
    Virginia
    Vehicle:
    2016 Silver Limited DC
    7” BDS, 37s
    Wow I learned a lot from this thread. Great posts, great video.
     
    Russ_S and Black Wolf like this.
  15. Jan 23, 2022 at 6:09 PM
    #15
    xc_tc

    xc_tc New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2021
    Member:
    #72329
    Messages:
    896
    Gender:
    Male
    This is an interesting comment. I’m curious, have you driven your Tundras at sea level? Or have you driven a F150 ecoboost at elevation? I think the Tundra loses a ton of power, especially above 8000 ft. I’ve never towed with the 5.7 Tundra but I towed a 10,000 lb trailer with a RAM 5.7 V8. That truck could barely hold 50 mph going up I70 east toward Denver through the Johnson tunnel. That’s like 10,000 ft I believe. The RAM hauled the trailer up I15 cajon pass no problem though, that’s much lower elevation but a similar grade. Not sure the grade at LaVeta Pass but typically mountain highways are limited to 6% max grade by design.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2022
  16. Jan 23, 2022 at 6:14 PM
    #16
    Smitty1701

    Smitty1701 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2021
    Member:
    #70214
    Messages:
    15
    Yea it will be the 2022.

    Thank you for the detailed explanation really makes a lot of sense now. Definitely will only go with 87 now.
     
  17. Jan 23, 2022 at 6:16 PM
    #17
    Smitty1701

    Smitty1701 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2021
    Member:
    #70214
    Messages:
    15
    Awesome video thanks for posting it!
     
    Russ_S[QUOTED] likes this.
  18. Jan 23, 2022 at 6:28 PM
    #18
    Totherion

    Totherion New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2021
    Member:
    #69777
    Messages:
    344
    Gender:
    Male
    Is UNL88 (once known as E-15) available in CO?

    I would probably run that at high elevation.

    It's perfectly fine to use in the new Tundra.
     
  19. Jan 23, 2022 at 6:28 PM
    #19
    Black Wolf

    Black Wolf Bigfoot Hunter, Sasquatch too, but not Yeti

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2014
    Member:
    #378
    Messages:
    40,012
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Aurora CO
    Vehicle:
    2022 Nissan Frontier SV 4X4
    TuwaPro rack, Z1 Offroad stuff, NISMO suspension stuff, FlowmasterFX Extreme exhaust, AIS, OVS, J&L can, other goodies on the way
    The lowest in altitude I ever drove my Tundra's was around here on the front range. Never towed a 10K trailer with my either Tundras and quite frankly I would never consider that. The "Eisenhower" (Johnson) tunnel is actually over 11K and yes the La Veta Pass grade is typical for mountain highways. If I was towing a 10K trailer I wouldn't recommend the Tundra. Go larger.....
     
  20. Jan 23, 2022 at 6:31 PM
    #20
    Black Wolf

    Black Wolf Bigfoot Hunter, Sasquatch too, but not Yeti

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2014
    Member:
    #378
    Messages:
    40,012
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Aurora CO
    Vehicle:
    2022 Nissan Frontier SV 4X4
    TuwaPro rack, Z1 Offroad stuff, NISMO suspension stuff, FlowmasterFX Extreme exhaust, AIS, OVS, J&L can, other goodies on the way
    Not much ethanol based gas here at all. Hard to find any ethanol gas other than dino with 10% ethanol added.
     
  21. Jan 23, 2022 at 6:40 PM
    #21
    xc_tc

    xc_tc New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2021
    Member:
    #72329
    Messages:
    896
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah that’s right, the entry to the tunnel is actually right at 11k. Loveland Pass next to it is at 12k and you get a pretty decent view of the tunnel up there. I was just passing through… I did the same drive with an F250 Powerstroke and it felt much more stable with the RAM. Same trailer, same weight.
    Anyway, I’ve never expected to hear any NA engine feels powerful at elevation. Even the GM 6.2 V8 feels like a dog above 8000 ft.
     
  22. Feb 2, 2022 at 5:32 PM
    #22
    Pig Rig

    Pig Rig Get to Work

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2021
    Member:
    #70305
    Messages:
    97
    Vehicle:
    Long Bed
    Towel for a Seat Cover
    I'm running Premium right now.

    Anybody else run Premium?

    91 I think

    I have the 5.7
     
    Metro14536 likes this.
  23. Feb 2, 2022 at 6:11 PM
    #23
    EvilSteve

    EvilSteve New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2021
    Member:
    #72503
    Messages:
    75
    Vehicle:
    2022 Lunar Rock Tundra Limited
    I’m running 91 in my ‘22. I live in Salt Lake City so not Denver high but still 4300ft+
     
    Pig Rig likes this.
  24. Feb 2, 2022 at 6:16 PM
    #24
    Pig Rig

    Pig Rig Get to Work

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2021
    Member:
    #70305
    Messages:
    97
    Vehicle:
    Long Bed
    Towel for a Seat Cover
    Is the TT supposed to take only 91? or is 87 acceptable as well?


    I live at 400
    Willamette Valley OR

    I am getting slightly better mileage with 91 in this 5.7, or my engine is breaking in
    Not sure yet
     
  25. Feb 2, 2022 at 6:38 PM
    #25
    Mattedfred

    Mattedfred Toyota Fan Boy Since ‘04

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2021
    Member:
    #70143
    Messages:
    3,615
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ted
    Cambridge, Ontario Canada
    Vehicle:
    2023 SR5 TRD Sport DC 4X4 in MGM
    TRD Skid Plate/Running Boards, Bison Soft Rollup Tonneau, Thule Canoe Rack, Bedmat, Tailgate Black Insert Badge, Northwest Seat Covers Neoprene Custom Fit Front Row Seat Covers. Tailgate Mat
    87
     
    Pig Rig[QUOTED] likes this.
  26. Feb 2, 2022 at 6:51 PM
    #26
    mass-hole

    mass-hole New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2019
    Member:
    #34378
    Messages:
    1,810
    They can run 87 no problem but should benefit from 91+ from both a performance and MPG standpoint. The MPG's may not change much, but it will be there.
     
    Pig Rig[QUOTED] likes this.
  27. Feb 2, 2022 at 6:52 PM
    #27
    Pig Rig

    Pig Rig Get to Work

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2021
    Member:
    #70305
    Messages:
    97
    Vehicle:
    Long Bed
    Towel for a Seat Cover
    Thanks.
    The 5.7 as well as the 2022 V-6TT?

    Just now realized I am in the Gen 3.0 thread, just did a search for octane and ended up here
     
  28. Dec 20, 2022 at 12:02 PM
    #28
    AverageAZN

    AverageAZN New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2022
    Member:
    #83367
    Messages:
    85
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Austin
    Vehicle:
    2004 Toyota Sequoia
    OME/Dobinson long travel lift, 34s
    I wish costco sold 87 here in colorado
     
  29. Dec 20, 2022 at 7:40 PM
    #29
    fastarget

    fastarget New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2018
    Member:
    #22739
    Messages:
    100
    Correct, turbos benefit from higher octane fuels and dyno with more horsepower, your engine will get worse mileage on low octane fuel, it will cause much knock, retard the timing and possibly run hotter.

    Look at the Bronco turbo engine ratings, Ford is now listing two different sets for the different fuel qualities.
     
  30. Dec 20, 2022 at 9:34 PM
    #30
    AZxp

    AZxp New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2022
    Member:
    #84858
    Messages:
    118
    Vehicle:
    '23 SR5
    Ford has different tunes for different octane. I don't think Toyota does. While higher octane may prevent the knock sensor from pulling power, it's unlikely that it makes any real world difference in power or mpg. Anecdotes for days but without different fuel maps, the benefit just isn't there
     

Products Discussed in

To Top